37 research outputs found
Pairwise accelerated failure time models for infectious disease transmission with external sources of infection
Pairwise survival analysis handles dependent happenings in infectious disease
transmission data by analyzing failure times in ordered pairs of individuals.
The contact interval in the pair is the time from the onset of
infectiousness in to infectious contact from to , where an
infectious contact is sufficient to infect if he or she is susceptible. The
contact interval distribution determines transmission probabilities and the
infectiousness profile of infected individuals. Many important questions in
infectious disease epidemiology involve the effects of covariates (e.g., age or
vaccination status) on transmission. Here, we generalize earlier pairwise
methods in two ways: First, we introduce an accelerated failure time model that
allows the contact interval rate parameter to depend on infectiousness
covariates for , susceptibility covariates for , and pairwise covariates.
Second, we show how internal infections (caused by individuals under
observation) and external infections (caused environmental or community
sources) can be handled simultaneously. In simulations, we show that these
methods produce valid point and interval estimates and that accounting for
external infections is critical to consistent estimation. Finally, we use these
methods to analyze household surveillance data from Los Angeles County during
the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic.Comment: 24 pages, 4 figure
Estimating and interpreting secondary attack risk: Binomial considered harmful
The household secondary attack risk (SAR), often called the secondary attack
rate or secondary infection risk, is the probability of infectious contact from
an infectious household member A to a given household member B, where we define
infectious contact to be a contact sufficient to infect B if he or she is
susceptible. Estimation of the SAR is an important part of understanding and
controlling the transmission of infectious diseases. In practice, it is most
often estimated using binomial models such as logistic regression, which
implicitly attribute all secondary infections in a household to the primary
case. In the simplest case, the number of secondary infections in a household
with m susceptibles and a single primary case is modeled as a binomial(m, p)
random variable where p is the SAR. Although it has long been understood that
transmission within households is not binomial, it is thought that multiple
generations of transmission can be safely neglected when p is small. We use
probability generating functions and simulations to show that this is a
mistake. The proportion of susceptible household members infected can be
substantially larger than the SAR even when p is small. As a result, binomial
estimates of the SAR are biased upward and their confidence intervals have poor
coverage probabilities even if adjusted for clustering. Accurate point and
interval estimates of the SAR can be obtained using longitudinal chain binomial
models or pairwise survival analysis, which account for multiple generations of
transmission within households, the ongoing risk of infection from outside the
household, and incomplete follow-up. We illustrate the practical implications
of these results in an analysis of household surveillance data collected by the
Los Angeles County Department of Public Health during the 2009 influenza A
(H1N1) pandemic.Comment: 25 pages, 8 figure
The risk of misclassifying subjects within principal component based asset index.
The asset index is often used as a measure of socioeconomic status in empirical research as an explanatory variable or to control confounding. Principal component analysis (PCA) is frequently used to create the asset index. We conducted a simulation study to explore how accurately the principal component based asset index reflects the study subjects' actual poverty level, when the actual poverty level is generated by a simple factor analytic model. In the simulation study using the PC-based asset index, only 1% to 4% of subjects preserved their real position in a quintile scale of assets; between 44% to 82% of subjects were misclassified into the wrong asset quintile. If the PC-based asset index explained less than 30% of the total variance in the component variables, then we consistently observed more than 50% misclassification across quintiles of the index. The frequency of misclassification suggests that the PC-based asset index may not provide a valid measure of poverty level and should be used cautiously as a measure of socioeconomic status
Evaluating the Medication Regimen Complexity Score as a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes in the Critically Ill
Background: Medication Regimen Complexity (MRC) refers to the combination of medication classes, dosages, and frequencies. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the scores of different MRC tools and the clinical outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Roger William Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island, which included 317 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) between 1 February 2020 and 30 August 2020. MRC was assessed using the MRC Index (MRCI) and MRC for the Intensive Care Unit (MRC-ICU). A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify associations among MRC scores, clinical outcomes, and a logistic classifier to predict clinical outcomes. Results: Higher MRC scores were associated with increased mortality, a longer ICU length of stay (LOS), and the need for mechanical ventilation (MV). MRC-ICU scores at 24 h were significantly (p \u3c 0.001) associated with increased ICU mortality, LOS, and MV, with ORs of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.06–1.19), 1.17 (1.1–1.24), and 1.21 (1.14–1.29), respectively. Mortality prediction was similar using both scoring tools (AUC: 0.88 [0.75–0.97] vs. 0.88 [0.76–0.97]. The model with 15 medication classes outperformed others in predicting the ICU LOS and the need for MV with AUCs of 0.82 (0.71–0.93) and 0.87 (0.77–0.96), respectively. Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that both MRC scores were associated with poorer clinical outcomes. The incorporation of MRC scores in real-time therapeutic decision making can aid clinicians to prescribe safer alternatives
Convergence of Humans, Bats, Trees, and Culture in Nipah Virus Transmission, Bangladesh.
Preventing emergence of new zoonotic viruses depends on understanding determinants for human risk. Nipah virus (NiV) is a lethal zoonotic pathogen that has spilled over from bats into human populations, with limited person-to-person transmission. We examined ecologic and human behavioral drivers of geographic variation for risk of NiV infection in Bangladesh. We visited 60 villages during 2011-2013 where cases of infection with NiV were identified and 147 control villages. We compared case villages with control villages for most likely drivers for risk of infection, including number of bats, persons, and date palm sap trees, and human date palm sap consumption behavior. Case villages were similar to control villages in many ways, including number of bats, persons, and date palm sap trees, but had a higher proportion of households in which someone drank sap. Reducing human consumption of sap could reduce virus transmission and risk for emergence of a more highly transmissible NiV strain
Influenza in Outpatient ILI Case-Patients in National Hospital-Based Surveillance, Bangladesh, 2007–2008
Recent population-based estimates in a Dhaka low-income community suggest that influenza was prevalent among children. To explore the epidemiology and seasonality of influenza throughout the country and among all age groups, we established nationally representative hospital-based surveillance necessary to guide influenza prevention and control efforts.We conducted influenza-like illness and severe acute respiratory illness sentinel surveillance in 12 hospitals across Bangladesh during May 2007–December 2008. We collected specimens from 3,699 patients, 385 (10%) which were influenza positive by real time RT-PCR. Among the sample-positive patients, 192 (51%) were type A and 188 (49%) were type B. Hemagglutinin subtyping of type A viruses detected 137 (71%) A/H1 and 55 (29%) A/H3, but no A/H5 or other novel influenza strains. The frequency of influenza cases was highest among children aged under 5 years (44%), while the proportions of laboratory confirmed cases was highest among participants aged 11–15 (18%). We applied kriging, a geo-statistical technique, to explore the spatial and temporal spread of influenza and found that, during 2008, influenza was first identified in large port cities and then gradually spread to other parts of the country. We identified a distinct influenza peak during the rainy season (May–September).Our surveillance data confirms that influenza is prevalent throughout Bangladesh, affecting a wide range of ages and causing considerable morbidity and hospital care. A unimodal influenza seasonality may allow Bangladesh to time annual influenza prevention messages and vaccination campaigns to reduce the national influenza burden. To scale-up such national interventions, we need to quantify the national rates of influenza and the economic burden associated with this disease through further studies
Estimating and interpreting secondary attack risk: Binomial considered biased.
The household secondary attack risk (SAR), often called the secondary attack rate or secondary infection risk, is the probability of infectious contact from an infectious household member A to a given household member B, where we define infectious contact to be a contact sufficient to infect B if he or she is susceptible. Estimation of the SAR is an important part of understanding and controlling the transmission of infectious diseases. In practice, it is most often estimated using binomial models such as logistic regression, which implicitly attribute all secondary infections in a household to the primary case. In the simplest case, the number of secondary infections in a household with m susceptibles and a single primary case is modeled as a binomial(m, p) random variable where p is the SAR. Although it has long been understood that transmission within households is not binomial, it is thought that multiple generations of transmission can be neglected safely when p is small. We use probability generating functions and simulations to show that this is a mistake. The proportion of susceptible household members infected can be substantially larger than the SAR even when p is small. As a result, binomial estimates of the SAR are biased upward and their confidence intervals have poor coverage probabilities even if adjusted for clustering. Accurate point and interval estimates of the SAR can be obtained using longitudinal chain binomial models or pairwise survival analysis, which account for multiple generations of transmission within households, the ongoing risk of infection from outside the household, and incomplete follow-up. We illustrate the practical implications of these results in an analysis of household surveillance data collected by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health during the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic
Recommended from our members
The risk of misclassifying subjects within principal component based asset index.
The asset index is often used as a measure of socioeconomic status in empirical research as an explanatory variable or to control confounding. Principal component analysis (PCA) is frequently used to create the asset index. We conducted a simulation study to explore how accurately the principal component based asset index reflects the study subjects' actual poverty level, when the actual poverty level is generated by a simple factor analytic model. In the simulation study using the PC-based asset index, only 1% to 4% of subjects preserved their real position in a quintile scale of assets; between 44% to 82% of subjects were misclassified into the wrong asset quintile. If the PC-based asset index explained less than 30% of the total variance in the component variables, then we consistently observed more than 50% misclassification across quintiles of the index. The frequency of misclassification suggests that the PC-based asset index may not provide a valid measure of poverty level and should be used cautiously as a measure of socioeconomic status